IT168 evaluation Last month, Apple released and launched the iPhone 7, which has undergone a major upgrade in camera performance, adding anti-shake and other functions. Let's take a look at some of the mainstream camera phones on the market today, and their performance is pretty good. For example, the recent Samsung S7 series, as well as the previously launched one plus three mobile phones is a good example, especially one plus three, while the price is lower than other products a few thousand dollars at the same time, can still compete with its flagship products in terms of performance , In addition to Sony's sensors, the camera's performance in terms of color and detail is very satisfying to the user. Then I will send you a photo comparison of iPhone 7 and One Plus 3 for everyone.
First introduced is the camera specifications, Apple iPhone 7 main lens specification is 12 million pixels, supports 5 times electronic zoom, aperture has also been raised to f/1.8, and added optical image stabilization function. These changes have improved the iPhone 7's shooting performance in low-light environments, which has effectively improved the iPhone 7's overall camera capability. One plus 3 uses 16 million pixels Sony IMX298 sensor, this sensor is RGBW four-color architecture, lens aperture f/2.0, support DTI pixel isolation technology, OIS optical image stabilization and EIS electronic image stabilization technology. Due to the use of dsp-assisted imaging, the white balance control will have a more prominent performance.
The following is a comparison of outdoor shooting samples. In this shooting, the automatic mode was used throughout and no settings were manually adjusted. Here is the first set of comparative photographs. Since it is outdoors, the weather is clear and there is plenty of sunshine, so both the shadows and the light areas can be well represented, and the buildings and sky in the distance are also very good. Clearly presented in the picture. In terms of details, the iPhone 7 has a higher degree of reduction in the shadow area on the lower left side. The high contrast distinguishes the shadow from the light area, and the transition area is also natural. However, in places where the light intensity is relatively high, such as the performance of street lights and trees on the right side, one plus three is more diverse with excellent white balance control capabilities. Compared to the iPhone 7 photos, To be relatively monotonous.
One plus 3 perspective proofs (aperture value: f/2.0, exposure time: 1/400 second, ISO: 100)
Apple iPhone 7 vision proofs (aperture value: f/1.8, exposure time: 1/600 sec, ISO:20)
The comparison between the second group of proofs can be seen to be similar to the previous one. In the performance of the shaded area, due to the difference between the one plus three and the iPhone 7 in the post-image algorithm, the one plus three photographed proofs with dsp assisted imaging are used. The color density is higher than that of the iPhone 7, and the proofs of the iPhone 7 are more authentic. These trees can be seen more clearly from the nearby trees and the distant flower ponds. Zoomed in to 100% to view the original image, due to the 16 million high-pixel main lens, one plus three details of the performance than the iPhone 7 slightly better.
One plus three proofs (aperture value: f/2.0, exposure time: 1/200 sec, ISO: 100)
Apple iPhone 7 proofs (aperture value: f/1.8, exposure time: 1/430 ​​sec, ISO: 20)
Lens zoomed in. The overall proofs of the two mobile phones didn't look much different. The pictures were very clear. The light and dark transitions between the two were natural and the details were very good. However, due to the diversity of colors, it can be seen that the color tone of one plus three samples is warmer, while the iPhone 7 is a bit cooler, which is similar to the performance of the previous comparison chart. iPhone 7 has blurred the trees in the background, so the screen may appear more layered. After the 100% original image is displayed, the gradual progress of the iPhone's background blurring can be more clearly seen. The sense of hierarchy is very prominent. In close shot shooting, iPhone 7 should be considered an absolute advantage.
One plus three mobile phone samples (aperture value: f/2.0, exposure time: 1/230 seconds, ISO: 100)
Apple iPhone 7 proofs (aperture value: f/1.8, exposure time: 1/610 sec, ISO: 20)
In a similar close-up contrast shot, the lens is closer to some of the contrast, the first look and feel is a plus color mobile phone 3 proofs more vivid colors, iPhone 7 proofs a little overall as a whole, I feel there is a certain color deviation. The true color should be more biased towards one plus three proofs, and the one-plus-three photographed colors give people a more comfortable feeling. So one plus three shots in the color performance is quite in place.
One plus three mobile phone samples (aperture value: f/2.0, exposure time: 1/160 seconds, ISO: 100)
Apple iPhone 7 proofs (aperture value: f/1.8, exposure time: 1/110 second, ISO:20)
Next is the indoor shooting session. This set of contrasts can better show the difference between one plus three and Apple iPhone 7 in terms of color saturation. One plus three obviously processed the picture to a certain extent. The visual effects and color performances give people a good feeling, and Apple iPhone 7 is closer to the real scene. From the texture of the steps and the texture of the book, you can see the iPhone 7's superb ability to restore reality.
One plus three mobile phone samples (aperture value: f/2.0, exposure time: 1/50 seconds, ISO: 125)
Apple iPhone 7 proofs (aperture value: f/1.8, exposure time: 1/100 second, ISO: 32)
Due to the difference between the indoor shooting and the outdoor lighting environment, the color performance began to show a difference. During the current round of testing, there was a problem of some deviations in the focus. Because the light was dark, the subject's flowerpot had some illusions. iPhone 7 shooting may be slightly better. Overall, the contrast between the groups is not much. There were some differences in the enlarged color expression, and it was obvious that one plus three pictures were brighter. However, due to the high ISO value, the graininess of the picture is heavy.
One plus three mobile phone samples (aperture value: f/2.0, exposure time: 1/17 second, ISO: 800)
Apple iPhone 7 proofs (aperture value: f/1.8, exposure time: 1/14 second, ISO: 100)
Next is a close-up shot of a still life. The iPhone 7 maintains the characteristics of the previous comparison. It restores the details and colors of the items accurately, and the background has a clear blur effect. The same one-plus-three photos also have a certain degree of background blurring effect, but the iPhone 7 is not as good as the overall color performance ability. After 100% magnification, slight smear marks will be seen in some details.
One plus three mobile phone samples (aperture value: f/2.0, exposure time: 1/25 second, ISO: 400)
Apple iPhone 7 proofs (aperture value: f/1.8, exposure time: 1/17 second, ISO:50)
The comparison of the photographed photographs first introduced so much. It can be seen from comparison that one plus three outdoor photographing ability and color rendering are very good. One plus three mobile phones relying on dsp assisted imaging can display the colors better and give People feel very natural and comfortable. The iPhone 7's shooting is trying to feel real, especially in terms of contrast, the distinction between shadows and light is very obvious, but sometimes the transition area may be slightly stiff, and it does not feel natural.
In the shooting of close shots, the background blur function of the iPhone 7 is perfectly reflected, and the overall picture is more layered. The indoor shooting speed of the iPhone 7 is slightly better, but from the perspective of imaging, one plus three colors will make people feel more comfortable. In general, both have their own advantages and their features are very clear. One plus three white balance is more prominent, the color performance is good, and the iPhone is pursuing a more realistic scene restoration, with good image contrast.